Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Ambassador Rooney

March 17, 2009, 10:59 am
Obama Sends Daniel Rooney to Dublin
By Helene Cooper

WASHINGTON—On the day of the year that America gives its practically undivided attention to the Irish, President Obama announced that he is naming Daniel Rooney—owner of the Pittsburgh Steelers—to be ambassador to Ireland.

Mr. Rooney, who campaigned for Mr. Obama and presented him with a Steelers jersey during a campaign event, co-founded the American Ireland Fund, an organization to promote peace in Northern Ireland through education programs.

“Dan Rooney is an unwavering supporter of Irish peace, culture and education,” Mr. Obama said in a statement.

And to mark St. Patrick’s Day with an additional splash, White House officials somehow— food coloring? — turned the fountain on the White House lawn green.

Districtly Green...


White House fountains green for St. Patrick's Day
By JULIE PACE

WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House is going green for St. Patrick's Day.

The water in the fountains on the north and south lawns of the White House has been dyed green to mark the national holiday of Ireland.

First Lady Michelle Obama came up with the idea for the festive touch, said spokeswoman Katie McCormick Lelyveld. She was inspired by the St. Patrick's Day celebrations in her hometown of Chicago, where the city marks the holiday by dyeing the river green.

"It's a little piece of home for our new home," said Lelyveld, who is also from Chicago.

Lelyveld said it's the first time the water in the White House fountains has been dyed. The green hue will stay until the dye runs outs.

President Barack Obama marks St. Patrick's Day with separate meetings in Washington with Irish leaders and he'll also attend St. Patrick's Day events in the White House and on Capitol Hill.

Monday, March 09, 2009

State of the Black Union


State of the Black Union in L.A. addresses mixed emotions
By Larry Gordon , LA Times
March 1, 2009


With an African American president in the White House during a tough recession, the 10th annual State of the Black Union convention organized by talk show host Tavis Smiley in Los Angeles on Saturday offered forums for both enthusiasm and worry about the future.

About 6,000 people attended the meeting at the Los Angeles Convention Center and heard prominent black political and cultural figures discuss African American issues in the era of Barack Obama. The topics included foreclosures, gang violence, education and U.S. diplomacy in Africa.

Smiley said the changes in Washington and the economic crisis provided "the most interesting background" for the gathering, which he started in 2000 in Los Angeles and staged in other cities in eight intervening years. "It's a wonderful time to come together. There's a lot of hope and energy in the air, but clearly this is a difficult time, too, the worst since the Great Depression," the author and broadcast personality said.

Among the speakers were civil rights leaders and pastors Jesse Jackson Sr. and Al Sharpton, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Los Angeles), writers Michael Eric Dyson and Cornel West, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael S. Steele, financial commentator Michelle Singletary and National Urban League President Marc Morial.

Dyson, a Georgetown University sociology professor who is an expert on hip-hop music, dismissed the notion that Obama's election means that the United States is a post-racial society. Having a black president is a rebuke to white supremacists but racism continues, he said, citing "Third World conditions in post-industrial cities," where many blacks live, and the Jan. 1 death in Oakland of Oscar Grant, a black man who was unarmed when allegedly shot in the back by a white transit officer. The officer has been charged with murder.

Besides, Dyson added in a humorous aside, a post-racial society would lose black icons. "You want to give up Stevie Wonder? That would make Stevie Wonder Frank Sinatra!"

Jackson urged the audience to pay close attention to whether federal anti-recession stimulus funds help community banks and small businesses in black neighborhoods, not just mega-sized financial conglomerates. "Will the money get down to the bottom?" he asked, from a platform that was decorated with symbols of the convention's corporate sponsors, including Wells Fargo and ExxonMobil.

Most of the audience members were Democrats enthusiastic about Obama, who sent a videotaped greeting to the convention. Yet Steele, the first African American elected as GOP national chairman, said he did not think twice about presenting Republican concerns about deficits and jobs. "This is not a hostile engagement for me at all. This is a chance for me to share a different perspective that exists in the black community," said Steele, a former lieutenant governor of Maryland.

Among the attendees was Daudi Blackwood, an actor from Hollywood, who wanted to focus on issues "that concern the black culture and how that relates to society." He too said Obama's election was a happy but also challenging moment. "It means now that there are no more excuses. If an African American man can become president, that kind of lets other people know that they don't have limits now" in pursuing career and other goals, he said.

Miriam Quates-Jackson of West Los Angeles, who works in accounting, brought her 5-year-old son, Jonathan, to the convention. She wanted him "to experience the positiveness in the black community. That's very important to me," she said.

Smoke Alarm

Virginia joins DC and Maryland with smoking ban in restaurant and bars....



RICHMOND, Va. -- Gov. Tim Kaine joined health advocates, legislative patrons and others on Monday in Virginia Beach to sign legislation banning smoking in restaurants and bars throughout Virginia.

Last month, lawmakers passed the measure that restricts smoking to separately ventilated rooms in restaurants and private clubs.

"This reasonable and necessary public health measure has been one of my priorities for several years," Kaine said.

The governor worked for years for a total ban of smoking in all restaurants. As past legislation failed it was practically inconceivable that one of country's top tobacco-producing states would join the ban-wagon.

Generally, the bill requires any restaurant that allows smoking to limit it to an area separated from nonsmoking patrons by a wall and a door and a ventilation system that doesn't mix secondhand smoke with fresh air.

The bill protects workers as well as patrons by prohibiting employers from requiring staff to work in areas where smoking is permitted.

Restaurants and smoking in Virginia FAQS
New legislation goes into effect Dec. 1, 2009, to protect restaurant workers and patrons from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke. The Virginia Department of Health offers these frequently asked questions and answers about the new law and the department’s role.

Can I smoke in a restaurant now?
Yes, if the restaurant has a smoking area. A restaurant with 50 or more seats, however, must provide a non-smoking area sufficient to meet customer demand.

When does the new law take effect?
Dec. 1, 2009.

What are the key provisions of the law?

Smoking will be prohibited in restaurants that are open to the public, with a few exceptions.

What kinds of establishments are exempt from the law?
Any place or operation that prepares or stores food to distribute to people in the same business operation, or of a related business operation for service to the public. Examples include operations that prepare food for catering services, pushcart operations, hotdog stands or other mobile points of service.
Any outdoor area of a restaurant, with or without a roof covering, provided it is not enclosed by temporary enclosures. Any restaurant located on the premises of any manufacturer of tobacco products. Any portion of a restaurant constructed so that the area where smoking is permitted is:

Structurally separated from the non-smoking areas of the restaurant, and
Separately vented to prevent the recirculation of air from the smoking area to the non-smoking area. At least one public entrance must be into an area where smoking is not permitted.

Any portion of a restaurant used exclusively for private functions, provided the functions are limited to those areas that are structurally separate and vented separately as described above.

Must a restaurant that is exempted from the ban permit patrons to smoke?
No. The owner or proprietor may voluntarily prohibit smoking in the establishment.

Does the ban prohibit smoking in restaurants operated in private clubs?
No. Private clubs, such as local VFWs and lodges, are exempt. Private clubs are those organizations that:

Are used exclusively for club purposes or events;
Operate solely for recreational, fraternal, social, patriotic, political, benevolent, or athletic purposes;
Have established bylaws, a constitution, or both, to govern its activities; and
Conducts the organization’s affairs and management by a board of directors, executive committee, or similar body chosen by the members at an annual meeting.

Will smoking be allowed in outdoor areas of restaurants?
Smoking will be permitted in outdoor areas of a restaurant provided the outdoor area is not enclosed by any screened wall, roll-up doors or other temporary enclosures.

Are there any "grandfathering" provisions in the law?
Yes. If a restaurant is in existence as of Dec. 1, 2009, it is not required to create an additional public entrance if the only public entrance is through an outdoor area of the restaurant where smoking is permitted.

Does the law affect employees who work in areas where the law permits smoking?
Yes. Wait or bus staff may not be required by the proprietor to work in any area of the restaurant where smoking may be permitted.

How will the ban be enforced? What role will VDH have in enforcing the ban?
During routine restaurant inspections, local health department environmental health specialists will determine compliance with the law, which requires proprietors to:

Post signs stating “No Smoking” or containing the international “No Smoking” symbol clearly and conspicuously in every restaurant where smoking is prohibited;
Remove all ashtrays and other smoking paraphernalia from all areas of the restaurant where smoking is prohibited; and

Assess, with the assistance of others, whether any separate smoking rooms comply with requirements of the law.

What types of policies and procedures will VDH use to enforce the ban? What happens if a proprietor or patron violates the ban? How will those policies and procedures be developed?

Over the next few months, VDH will work with the Office of the Attorney General and local law enforcement and local governments to develop policies and procedures for enforcing this law. Stakeholders will also be involved in the development of these policies and procedures.

Who can I contact at the Virginia Department of Health for more information?
Contact Gary Hagy, Director, Division of Food and Environmental Services, (804) 864-7455, Gary.Hagy@vdh.virginia.gov.

Thursday, March 05, 2009

"Monkey" Business


Book Display at a Barnes & Nobles store in Coral Gables, FL
A public apology was later issued:

"Barnes and Nobles would like to publicly apologize for an incident in our Coral Gables, Florida store. We believe that a customer played a cruel joke and placed an inappropriate title, 'Monkeys,' in the front window of our store, where we were featuring books by or about President Obama."

"We want to assure our customers that the book placed by someone other than any of out booksellers was never intended to be included in our display and was removed as soon as we became aware of the situation. We are looking into it, and taking the step necessary so that it doesn't happen again. It certainly was not a part of our merchandising and we regret that we didn't see the placement of this title immediately." -- Mary Ellen Keating, Barnes & Nobles Spokesperson

Race and the ape image

Associating blacks with nonhuman primates is deeply embedded, has disturbing effects
By Phillip Atiba Goff and Jennifer L. Eberhardt
March 3, 2009 (Baltimore Sun)


An apology has been issued. The protests are fading. And it may be tempting to dismiss the uproar over the provocative chimpanzee cartoon in The New York Post as just another "race card" dust-up.

But that would obscure an underlying reality captured in the Post situation and demonstrated by research we have conducted: Some racial associations are embedded so deeply that they are difficult to recognize, much less eradicate - and they continue to shape our behavior and ideas.

The Post cartoon depicted two police officers standing over a chimp they had shot dead in the street. The image directly referenced the killing in Connecticut of a pet chimp that had mauled its owner's friend. But the caption was more oblique: "They'll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill."

Many people thought they recognized a hateful association in the cartoon - between blacks and apes. They were shocked by the ugly possibility that it was equating the violent chimpanzee with President Barack Obama. Some even considered it a veiled invitation to murder the nation's first black president.



In the 19th century and well into the 20th, popular media, from movies to fiction to political cartoons, frequently portrayed blacks as more simian than human. It was an association that provided cover for slavery itself, as well as anti-black violence. Lynchings in the United States were often justified by relying on this dehumanizing association. Referring to blacks as apelike is among the most violent and hurtful legacies of our nation's difficult racial past.

The negative association - this linking of two ideas in the human mind - goes far beyond historical legacy. In multiple studies on ape and African-American associations, using different experimental approaches with white and nonwhite subjects, we have found that the link persists and can be triggered in the most egalitarian of people. Our research also suggests a particularly disturbing consequence: When the association was called to mind, even in the absence of conscious awareness, participants in our laboratory experiments were more likely to endorse violence against African-Americans.

This finding is made more disturbing by one of the other studies we conducted. It looked into the role of the media in death penalty cases. Using data compiled by the criminologist David Baldus, we examined 153 cases in the Philadelphia area in which a defendant was found guilty and statutes allowed for the application of the death penalty, among other sentencing options.

We read every article published about these cases in the Philadelphia Inquirer, from the time the crime was first reported to the sentencing of those arrested, and we tallied the number of ape-related metaphors that appeared in print - things such as "an urban jungle" and "aping a victim's screams." Not only were black men and their crimes much more likely to be described in apelike terms, but the number of ape-related metaphors predicted the likelihood that a defendant would be sentenced to death.

It is important to note that in every study in which we measured people's racial attitudes, using varying techniques, those views about blacks did not influence the results. In other words, the measurable presence of anti-black prejudice did not dictate how strongly people associated blacks with apes. Instead, we believe that even among people who aren't particularly prejudiced, the association between blacks and apes is still strong, held in place through "implicit knowledge" - the result of a lifetime of conditioning, rooted in historical representations of blacks as less than human.

All of this suggests that it was not simple racism, or just a desire to liken the creation of the stimulus bill to an out-of-control chimp, that was reflected in the Post cartoon. It was a kind of racial programming, a legacy even something as progressive as Mr. Obama's election cannot obliterate.

Social psychologists Phillip Atiba Goff and Jennifer L. Eberhardt are professors at UCLA and Stanford University, respectively. This article originally appeared in the Los Angeles Times.

Post your comments!

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Taxation Without Representation


DC Residents...we finally get our day in court...well, the Senate. What do you think? Should the District of Columbia get a voting representative in the U.S. House?
Post your thoughts!


D.C.'s Day in the Senate
A disenfranchised city on the verge of a long-overdue debate
Tuesday, February 24, 2009; Page A12

IT WAS TO THE discredit of the Senate in 2007 that it would not allow even consideration of a bill to give D.C. residents voting rights. Indeed, the last time the second-class status of D.C. residents was debated on the Senate floor was 30 years ago. So today's vote on Senate Bill 160 -- the D.C. House Voting Rights Act -- is more than overdue. It is time for the Senate to rectify its past mistakes and agree to hold an up-or-down vote on legislation giving District residents their rights as American citizens.

The measure would give long-disenfranchised D.C. residents a voting representative in the House. This would be accomplished by expanding the 435-member House by two seats, one for the District and the other for the state next in line to gain a seat. Utah would be the immediate beneficiary.

Two years ago, similar legislation fell three votes short of the 60 needed to proceed to debate and consideration. Advocates for D.C. voting rights, buoyed by Democratic congressional gains in November as well as the support of President Obama, are cautiously optimistic. But they thought they had the votes two years ago, too, so they worry about defections or unwanted amendments sabotaging the bill. It was encouraging to hear Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who successfully led GOP opposition to the bill in 2007, tell us yesterday that he believes the measure will pass Congress -- and that it will then be shot down in court. We hope Mr. McConnell's legislative prediction is correct, even as we disagree with his view that the bill is patently unconstitutional.

As House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) wrote in a Post opinion piece Sunday, there are plausible legal arguments on both sides of the issue, with each able to draw on the Constitution and invoke the Founders' intent. Mr. Hoyer, a staunch supporter of D.C. voting rights, believes the measure is constitutional. It is likely that any measure voted out of Congress will include provision for expedited court review, so we will find out. In the meantime, the Senate should not lose sight of the fact that nearly 600,000 people who live in the nation's capital do not have a voice in their government. We can't think of a topic more worthy of Senate debate.

For more background on the DC Voting Act, visit www.dcvote.org/

Monday, January 19, 2009

President Barak Obama



Post your Inauguration Day stories, highlights and memories!

President Obama's Inaugural Speech:
'What Is Required of Us Now Is a New Era of Responsibility'


My fellow citizens:

I stand here today humbled by the task before us, grateful for the trust you have bestowed, mindful of the sacrifices borne by our ancestors. I thank President Bush for his service to our nation, as well as the generosity and cooperation he has shown throughout this transition.

Forty-four Americans have now taken the presidential oath. The words have been spoken during rising tides of prosperity and the still waters of peace. Yet, every so often, the oath is taken amidst gathering clouds and raging storms. At these moments, America has carried on not simply because of the skill or vision of those in high office, but because we the people have remained faithful to the ideals of our forebears and true to our founding documents.

So it has been. So it must be with this generation of Americans.

That we are in the midst of crisis is now well understood. Our nation is at war against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred. Our economy is badly weakened, a consequence of greed and irresponsibility on the part of some but also our collective failure to make hard choices and prepare the nation for a new age. Homes have been lost, jobs shed, businesses shuttered. Our health care is too costly, our schools fail too many, and each day brings further evidence that the ways we use energy strengthen our adversaries and threaten our planet.

These are the indicators of crisis, subject to data and statistics. Less measurable, but no less profound, is a sapping of confidence across our land, a nagging fear that America's decline is inevitable, that the next generation must lower its sights.

* * *

Today I say to you that the challenges we face are real, they are serious and they are many. They will not be met easily or in a short span of time. But know this, America: They will be met.

On this day, we gather because we have chosen hope over fear, unity of purpose over conflict and discord.

On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn-out dogmas that for far too long have strangled our politics.

We remain a young nation, but in the words of Scripture, the time has come to set aside childish things. The time has come to reaffirm our enduring spirit; to choose our better history; to carry forward that precious gift, that noble idea, passed on from generation to generation: the God-given promise that all are equal, all are free and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness.

In reaffirming the greatness of our nation, we understand that greatness is never a given. It must be earned. Our journey has never been one of shortcuts or settling for less. It has not been the path for the fainthearted, for those who prefer leisure over work or seek only the pleasures of riches and fame. Rather, it has been the risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things -- some celebrated, but more often men and women obscure in their labor -- who have carried us up the long, rugged path towards prosperity and freedom.

For us, they packed up their few worldly possessions and traveled across oceans in search of a new life.

For us, they toiled in sweatshops and settled the West, endured the lash of the whip and plowed the hard earth.

For us, they fought and died in places like Concord and Gettysburg, Normandy and Khe Sahn.

Time and again, these men and women struggled and sacrificed and worked till their hands were raw so that we might live a better life. They saw America as bigger than the sum of our individual ambitions, greater than all the differences of birth or wealth or faction.

This is the journey we continue today. We remain the most prosperous, powerful nation on Earth. Our workers are no less productive than when this crisis began. Our minds are no less inventive, our goods and services no less needed than they were last week or last month or last year. Our capacity remains undiminished. But our time of standing pat, of protecting narrow interests and putting off unpleasant decisions -- that time has surely passed. Starting today, we must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off and begin again the work of remaking America.

For everywhere we look, there is work to be done. The state of our economy calls for action bold and swift. And we will act not only to create new jobs but to lay a new foundation for growth. We will build the roads and bridges, the electric grids and digital lines that feed our commerce and bind us together. We will restore science to its rightful place and wield technology's wonders to raise health care's quality and lower its costs. We will harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories. And we will transform our schools and colleges and universities to meet the demands of a new age. All this we can do. All this we will do.

* * *

Now, there are some who question the scale of our ambitions, who suggest that our system cannot tolerate too many big plans. Their memories are short, for they have forgotten what this country has already done, what free men and women can achieve when imagination is joined to common purpose and necessity to courage.

What the cynics fail to understand is that the ground has shifted beneath them, that the stale political arguments that have consumed us for so long no longer apply. The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works, whether it helps families find jobs at a decent wage, care they can afford, a retirement that is dignified. Where the answer is yes, we intend to move forward. Where the answer is no, programs will end. And those of us who manage the public's knowledge will be held to account, to spend wisely, reform bad habits and do our business in the light of day, because only then can we restore the vital trust between a people and their government.

Nor is the question before us whether the market is a force for good or ill. Its power to generate wealth and expand freedom is unmatched. But this crisis has reminded us that without a watchful eye, the market can spin out of control. The nation cannot prosper long when it favors only the prosperous. The success of our economy has always depended not just on the size of our gross domestic product, but on the reach of our prosperity; on the ability to extend opportunity to every willing heart -- not out of charity, but because it is the surest route to our common good.

As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. Our Founding Fathers, faced with perils that we can scarcely imagine, drafted a charter to assure the rule of law and the rights of man, a charter expanded by the blood of generations. Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for expedience's sake. And so, to all other peoples and governments who are watching today, from the grandest capitals to the small village where my father was born: Know that America is a friend of each nation and every man, woman and child who seeks a future of peace and dignity, and we are ready to lead once more.

Recall that earlier generations faced down fascism and communism not just with missiles and tanks, but with sturdy alliances and enduring convictions. They understood that our power alone cannot protect us, nor does it entitle us to do as we please. Instead, they knew that our power grows through its prudent use. Our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint.

We are the keepers of this legacy; guided by these principles once more, we can meet those new threats that demand even greater effort, even greater cooperation and understanding between nations. We'll begin to responsibly leave Iraq to its people and forge a hard-earned peace in Afghanistan. With old friends and former foes, we'll work tirelessly to lessen the nuclear threat and roll back the specter of a warming planet. We will not apologize for our way of life; nor will we waver in its defense. And for those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents, we say to you now that our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken. You cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you.

For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus, and nonbelievers. We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth. And because we have tasted the bitter swill of civil war and segregation and emerged from that dark chapter stronger and more united, we cannot help but believe that the old hatreds shall someday pass; that the lines of tribe shall soon dissolve; that as the world grows smaller, our common humanity shall reveal itself; and that America must play its role in ushering in a new era of peace.

To the Muslim world, we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect. To those leaders around the globe who seek to sow conflict or blame their society's ills on the West, know that your people will judge you on what you can build, not what you destroy. To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong side of history, but that we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist.

To the people of poor nations, we pledge to work alongside you to make your farms flourish and let clean waters flow; to nourish starved bodies and feed hungry minds. And to those nations like ours that enjoy relative plenty, we say we can no longer afford indifference to the suffering outside our borders, nor can we consume the world's resources without regard to effect. For the world has changed, and we must change with it.

* * *

As we consider the road that unfolds before us, we remember with humble gratitude those brave Americans who, at this very hour, patrol far-off deserts and distant mountains. They have something to tell us, just as the fallen heroes who lie in Arlington whisper through the ages. We honor them not only because they are guardians of our liberty, but because they embody the spirit of service: a willingness to find meaning in something greater than themselves. And yet, at this moment, a moment that will define a generation, it is precisely this spirit that must inhabit us all.

For as much as government can do and must do, it is ultimately the faith and determination of the American people upon which this nation relies. It is the kindness to take in a stranger when the levees break, the selflessness of workers who would rather cut their hours than see a friend lose their job, which sees us through our darkest hours. It is the firefighter's courage to storm a stairway filled with smoke, but also a parent's willingness to nurture a child, that finally decides our fate.

Our challenges may be new, the instruments with which we meet them may be new, but those values upon which our success depends -- honesty and hard work, courage and fair play, tolerance and curiosity, loyalty and patriotism -- these things are old. These things are true. They have been the quiet force of progress throughout our history. What is demanded then is a return to these truths. What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility -- a recognition, on the part of every American, that we have duties to ourselves, our nation and the world, duties that we do not grudgingly accept but rather seize gladly, firm in the knowledge that there is nothing so satisfying to the spirit, so defining of our character than giving our all to a difficult task.

This is the price and the promise of citizenship.

This is the source of our confidence: the knowledge that God calls on us to shape an uncertain destiny.

This is the meaning of our liberty and our creed, why men and women and children of every race and every faith can join in celebration across this magnificent Mall. And why a man whose father less than 60 years ago might not have been served at a local restaurant can now stand before you to take a most sacred oath.

So let us mark this day in remembrance of who we are and how far we have traveled. In the year of America's birth, in the coldest of months, a small band of patriots huddled by nine campfires on the shores of an icy river. The capital was abandoned. The enemy was advancing. The snow was stained with blood. At a moment when the outcome of our revolution was most in doubt, the father of our nation ordered these words be read to the people:

"Let it be told to the future world that in the depth of winter, when nothing but hope and virtue could survive, that the city and the country, alarmed at one common danger, came forth to meet it."

America, in the face of our common dangers, in this winter of our hardship, let us remember these timeless words; with hope and virtue, let us brave once more the icy currents, and endure what storms may come; let it be said by our children's children that when we were tested, we refused to let this journey end, that we did not turn back nor did we falter; and with eyes fixed on the horizon and God's grace upon us, we carried forth that great gift of freedom and delivered it safely to future generations.

Thank you. God bless you. And God bless the United States of America.